From a GEO Score to a Recovery Queue
A visibility dashboard tells you where substantial answers leave you out. The Recovery Queue shows the exact receipt, a citation observed in that same answer, and a reviewed next step — then watches whether the answer changes.
A score is a diagnosis, not a treatment
Most GEO tools stop at the number. They tell you the AI leaves you out, or gets a fact wrong, and then hand you a chart. Knowing you’re absent is the alarm — but an alarm you can’t act on is just anxiety with a dashboard.
The reason action is hard is that the work is buried: which pages were cited in the exact answer, whether you can act on them, who controls them, and what a truthful message would say. The Recovery Queue does that triage while keeping citation and causation separate.
Contest the lost answer
For every winnable buyer question where a substantial answer recommends a competitor and leaves you out, the queue shows a source cited in that same answer, ranks how actionable the source type is, and suggests an outreach or owned-page step without promising a verdict change.
A Reddit thread you can join transparently, a listicle whose editor you can pitch, a review profile to complete, a comparison page you publish yourself — drafts are shown only when stored evidence and the quality gate support them; placeholders and unsupported claims are withheld.
- See a prioritized citation from the exact competitor-winning answer, not a wall of unrelated URLs.
- Know whether to publish, pitch, join a thread, or out-publish.
- Copy a draft written in a founder’s voice — no fabricated facts.
Correct the record without inventing attribution
When a stored answer states something false about you — wrong pricing, a feature you don’t have, the wrong category — the queue shows the exact answer and its citations. It labels a page as carrying the disputed value only when fetched page text contains both your brand and that value.
Third-party correction outreach is withheld until that page-text check passes. An owned-page clarification can still state the approved true fact, with no promise about how an engine will use it.
- Each false claim traces to its exact answer run; cited pages remain citation context unless the disputed value is found on-page.
- A correction draft states the truth without overstating it.
- When nothing third-party is cited, the fix lands on a page you own.
Honest by construction
Mark an item shipped and it joins the same weekly loop that watches your tracked prompts: we keep re-sampling that exact question across engines and report whether the answer changed — up or down. We surface the change; we never claim we caused it.
And we’re straight about the horizon. Drafts are starting points, not guarantees, and there is no reliable provider update schedule. A correction moves toward resolved only when a later substantial sample on the same question and path no longer repeats the disputed claim.
See it on your own brand
What do AI answers say on the questions you track?
BuilderRadar samples reviewed tracked questions across up to 10 provenance-separated AI-answer paths spanning 9 families, stores valid answers with evidence, and records comparable answer changes with the receipt.
Keep reading