Builder Radar runs reviewed tracked questions across up to ten provenance-separated AI-answer paths spanning nine families and retains valid sampled answers. See where competitors are recommended while you are absent, where sampled claims conflict with approved facts, and what to review next - evidence you can hand a client, not a score you take on faith.
No credit card · Limited first report · Clear data usage
We map your category and likely rivals, then suggest tracked questions for you to review.
Your plan’s available engines answer. We record who they recommend, who they name instead, and which sampled claims conflict with approved facts.
Proof-backed factual conflicts, winnable competitor wins, same-answer citations, and QA-gated draft starting points - valid samples retain sanitized answer text.
Illustrative preview · sample project & data
Receipt · illustrative example
“best uptime monitoring for indie SaaS”
Before · 2026-05-14
“…the most commonly recommended options are PingPatrol and RoboWatch. Both offer status pages and multi-region checks…”
After · 2026-06-20
“…PingPatrol, Statuslaneand RoboWatch are solid choices - Statuslane stands out for solo founders on price…”
Every proof-backed receipt links to the stored sanitized answer text, with the same engine, dates and observed citations. We show the change; we never claim your fix caused it.
Not a generic scoreboard. Three evidence classes you can inspect in the sampled answers.
The tracked questions where a substantial answer recommends a competitor and leaves you out - with any source cited in that same answer.
See which rival was recommended, for which prompt, and the highest-priority source cited in that same answer to inspect first.
Proof-backed category, pricing, feature, and identity conflicts - the sampled quote, your approved fact, and evidence status.
Each qualifying factual conflict or winnable loss can become a reviewable correction or monitoring task - with the exact evidence receipt.
Question · Answer · Evidence · Diagnosis · Recovery
See qualifying factual conflicts and winnable competitor wins across engines that reported substantial answers, ranked by observed breadth and disclosed intent proxies.
Open the exact substantial answer, engine, date and citations, plus same-engine before/after text where comparable samples exist.
Get same-answer citation context, a QA-gated draft starting point when evidence supports one, and a re-check plan; later comparable samples can form a receipt.
AI-visibility numbers are easy to inflate and hard to check. So we show our work: what we sample, how often, and what we refuse to claim.
No answer verdict or observed visibility score is computed without a substantial retained answer - engine, date, sanitized text and captured citations. Heuristic priorities are labelled separately.
Each path is judged against its disclosed daily, weekly, on-demand or snapshot cadence. Only overdue automatic paths show as stale or down.
When an answer flips after you ship a fix, we show the before/after receipt and say the answer changed - we never claim your fix caused it.
Accuracy alerts link the exact substantial answer to your stored fact. Independent model-family verification is shown only when that separate check has completed.
See a one-time Gemini snapshot of your reviewed tracked questions for free. Continuous tracking, receipts, alerts and client reports live on the paid plans.
Just looking?
One-time snapshot · no card
For founders - continuous tracking with the evidence kept
Everything in Solo, built for client work
Asked by people who've been burned by dashboards before.
Answer-visibility verdicts, winnable losses, movements, and before/after outcomes trace to substantial retained answer text you can inspect - engine, date, sanitized text and captured citations. Coverage, crawl, demand-proxy, and priority figures are labeled with their own inputs. We disclose each path’s cadence and never claim your action caused an answer to change.
We record up to ten web-grounded answer paths across nine vendor/model families. OpenAI Search API and the ChatGPT consumer UI have separate provenance IDs because API and browser answers can differ. Other paths are explicitly labeled as official APIs, consumer/search UIs, or raw models supplied live retrieval context; we do not present those transports as equivalent.
Cadence depends on the plan and path: one-time snapshot, on-demand, weekly, or daily. The dashboard shows the last usable sample and a cadence-aware status instead of judging every path by one clock. The free plan is a one-time Gemini snapshot.
No tool can guarantee that, and we refuse to pretend otherwise. We show the substantial evidence run for each winnable loss, citation context from that same answer, and a QA-gated draft starting point only when evidence supports one. Later substantial samples on the same question and path can form a before/after receipt.
A one-time Gemini snapshot of reviewed tracked questions: observed visibility, any tracked rival recommended while your brand is absent, and a read-only preview of evidence-backed factual conflicts. No card required; continuous tracking, receipts, and alerts are paid-plan features.
Yes - the Agency plan covers 3 brands with unbranded client reports (BuilderRadar branding removed; no custom customer logo), a monthly client-report email, CSV export of the answer ledger, API keys, webhooks, an MCP server, and 3 team seats.
Sample the questions you choose to track. Builder Radar shows qualifying factual conflicts, who was recommended instead, and what evidence to review first.
Launch App FreeNo credit card · Cancel anytime